Total Pageviews

Tuesday, 6 July 2021

Creative Evolution? You Must Be Joking!

1. Geologic Column. The request, “Show us a hole or incision in the ground that depicts the ‘Geologic Column’ (‘Geologic Time Scale’) exactly as it is supposed to look like as depicted on Evolutionists’ wall-charts or in their textbooks and encyclopaedias,” seems to have fallen on deaf ears. Does the ‘Geologic Column’ even exist, or is it pure conjecture, i.e. a theoretical construct from the minds of the Evolutionists hell-bent on proving something that doesn’t exist?

2. Mrs. Ples (Sterkfontein/Maropeng, South Africa). According to sources, Mrs./Mr. /Ms. Ples, a ‘hominid’ skull found at the Sterkfontein Caves South Africa) is ‘2.05 million years’ old. [Wikipedia]. 
   Using an arbitrary figure of 70 years per generation, the gap between Mrs. Ples and today’s generation of humans there theoretically could have been 29 285 generations of her species over the period; at an arbitrary 40 years per generation, there could have been as many as 51 250 generations of her species over the period. 
   Question: Where are the absent and missing fossils representing the guesstimated 29 285 or 51 250 transitional stages between Mrs. Ples and today’s generation? Also: Where is the evidence that Mrs. Ples was even ‘married’ or that she had ever had any offspring; and how come Nature preserved her skull but not the rest (probably millions of fossil fragments) of others still missing?

3. Creative Evolution. The critical difference between Classical (Atheistic) Darwinism and Creative (Theistic) Evolution is that the first supports the idea that ‘Evolution’ occurred by random and spontaneous accident without the interference or help of an ‘Intelligent Designer’ (Creator), while the second supports the idea that ‘Evolution’ happened with the help of an Intelligent Designer (Creator). Do the math: 

3.1 Should Classical (Atheistic) Darwinism be found to be correct (valid) then Creative Evolution will not fly as it needs God in its equation to qualify as a viable theory. 

3.2 Should Classical (Atheistic) Darwinism be found to be incorrect (invalid) then Creative Evolution will again not fly, as it needs ‘Evolution’ in its equation to qualify as a viable theory. 


No comments: