Total Pageviews

Monday 5 July 2021

Build Your House On The Rock Of Ages

1. The Unverifiability of Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism. In order to affirm Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism  and verify its wild claims (theories, opinions) about the history and origins of the Cosmos and also the evolutionists’ claims about the origins and age of the earth, skeptics will have to travel ‘billions of years’ into the past to verify ‘cosmic’ or ‘stellar evolution’.  Likewise, to affirm the evolutionists’ claims about the ‘anthropological & biological’ origins and age of mankind, skeptics will have to travel ‘millions of years’ into the past to verify the veracity of theories founded on palaeontological excavations and fossils. How this unverifiabilty can be accepted as 'irrefutable observable & measureable empirical evidence founded on the scientific method' boggles the mind.

2. The Unverifiability of Darwinian Creationism (Creative Theistic Evolution).  This hybrid worldview of a cross between the Genesis Creation Record and Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism  proves to be even more unverifiable for the same reasons as mentioned before  and more. For instance:

► Should Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism be found to have been false (invalid) then Darwinian Creationism (Creative Evolution) will fall off the bus because Darwinian Creationism (Creative Evolution) needs ‘Evolution’ in the equation to survive as a viable theory.

► Should Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism be found to have been true (valid) then Darwinian Creationism will again fall off the bus because Darwinian Creationism (Creative Evolution) needs a ‘Creator’ in its equation to survive as a viable theory.

3. The Evolution ‘Catch-22’.  Ideas and theories about ‘Evolution’ have proliferated but we can safely deduce that they finally have bifurcated into the two dominant worldviews of Classic Atheistic Darwinism and Darwinian Creationism (Creative Theistic Evolutionism).  So, although these two worldviews are trying to perambulate over the convoluted landscape of troubled and perplexed academia as bedpartners in search of the same ‘missing link’, they are actually mortal enemies, since:

► these two worldviews are mutually exclusive and cannot both be right (true/valid) at the same time.

► In terms of the ‘no honour among thieves’ principle Darwinian Creationism falls off the bus everytime anyway whether Classic (Atheistic) Darwinism would be found to have been either valid (true) or invalid (false).

   Jesus Christ has said:  “Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:  And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.” [Matthew7:24-25].

 

No comments: