Total Pageviews

Sunday, 9 February 2025

POST COVID FORMAL APOLOGIES

 

PJ STASSEN
Centurion
9 February 2025

 


To: Whom It May Concern

 

POST-COVID FORMAL APOLOGIES 

1. PRESIDENTIAL PARDON FOR WHITE HOUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIST. On 20 January 2025, a full, unconditional, pre-emptive presidential pardon was given to Dr. A. Fauci, resident epidemiologist of the US Government, effective back to 1 January 2014, by President Joe Biden for any offenses he might have committed during that time.

   The pardon was issued allegedly as a protective measure against potential "revenge" or politically motivated prosecutions by the incoming Trump administration. Biden's administration felt that public servants (like Fauci) who were involved in contentious issues like the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, were being unfairly targeted with threats of investigation or prosecution for their service. This action was intended to shield Fauci from any legal repercussions from those who criticized his handling of the health crisis. The fact that Dr. Fauci did not decline the pardon speaks volumes of his probable guilt in some areas associated with the Wuhan Lab and the Coronavirus, one way or he other. 

   Be that as it may, Dr. A. Fauci’s security detail for the White House has, in the meantime, been revoked on 24 January 2025; this action included pulling the security provided by the National Institutes of Health, thus bringing to a close this unsavoury Big Pharma driven saga of suspense and Nazi-like coercion of citizens worldwide into a devastating hard lockdown of “pandemic proportions" (pardon the pun).  

2 BREACH OF THE ‘NUREMBERG CODE OF ETHICAL RESEARCH’. Many citizens today, myself included, are of the opinion that Dr. A. Fauci and Big Pharma were in breach of the post WW2 Nuremberg Code for Ethical Research, and, although not conclusively proved yet, investigations by Senator Rand Paul (USA) etc. are still ongoing against the backdrop of the noise by critics who argue that the rapid development and deployment of mRNA vaccines might not have allowed for adequate, informed consent, or the full understanding of long-term effects, potentially violating the principle of voluntary consent with full understanding.

   While no formal legal proceedings or widespread legal recognition have explicitly labelled the mRNA vaccine rollout as a breach of the Nuremberg Code, the debate, however, continues in public discourse, with some groups and individuals raising ethical concerns. 

3 ISOLATION DECISION: VACCINATED/NOT VACCINATED. It so transpired that my wife and I, who at the time had chosen not to be vaccinated, but had opted for the ‘natural immunity’ route instead, were, along with others from the (notorious) ‘Anti-Vaccination Resistance’,  consequently collectively widely castigated for our stance by copious mainline media rhetoric in support of mandatory vaccinations and the subsequent harassment following from all and sundry quarters, blaming people like us for perpetuating and expediting the spread of the disease.

   This prompted us to eventually go into isolation since the last thing we wanted to be seen or charged with was that we we could be the cause of members of family or friends being infected by our monumental indiscretion of refusing to be vaccinated with a hastily concocted cocktail of a series of mRNA jabs masquerading as a bona fide vaccine.   

   Since we had opted for the ‘natural immunity’ route, it was thus not surprising that we eventually contracted Covid during November 2023, which we, together, overcame in about eight to ten days; my wife with the aid of her Bankmed approved general practitioner, and I with my personal set of tried and tested home remedies. According to Dr. Peter McCollough and Co., the natural immunity acquired from a Covid19 episode is potentially fourteen times more effective than any vaccine thus far produced, provided of course that one survives the ordeal. 

4. FORMAL APOLOGIES. My wife and I thus wish to hereby humbly, and profusely so, apologise to all members of family or any friends that have (or may have) been affronted or offended by our choice at the time to go into isolation for a “season” to avoid the charge of “perpetuating the disease” and/or “indiscriminately infecting others” by our hardline refusal to be vaccinated at the time.

   The recent presidential pardon for Dr. A. Fauci, however, serves as a clear vindication of our formally unpopular choice and stance toward this saga, namely that this famed epidemiologist and his cohorts have probably been guilty of considerable overreach when they forced, egged on by considerable media hype and social hysteria, just about the entire world into a total lockdown that eventually wrecked lives, bankrupted businesses and impaired the education of children worldwide by keeping them away from school and the beneficial social interaction with their peers.  The way forward probably is best described by the poet: 

“A friend is one who knows the best and the worst of us and loves us just the same.”

(Henry Longfellow, 1807-1882). 

Kind regards
& God bless  


PJ (Piet) Stassen
CENTURION
RSA.
Sunday, 9 Feb 2025.

No comments: