To: Whom It May Concern
POST-COVID FORMAL APOLOGIES
1. PRESIDENTIAL PARDON FOR WHITE HOUSE EPIDEMIOLOGIST. On 20
January 2025, a full, unconditional, pre-emptive presidential pardon was given to Dr. A. Fauci, resident
epidemiologist of the US Government, effective back to 1 January 2014, by
President Joe Biden for any offenses he might have
committed during that time.
The pardon was issued allegedly
as a protective measure against potential "revenge" or politically
motivated prosecutions by the incoming Trump administration. Biden's
administration felt that public servants (like Fauci) who were involved in
contentious issues like the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, were being
unfairly targeted with threats of investigation or prosecution for their
service. This action was intended to shield Fauci from any legal repercussions
from those who criticized his handling of the health crisis. The fact that Dr.
Fauci did not decline the pardon speaks volumes of his probable guilt in some
areas associated with the Wuhan Lab and the Coronavirus, one way or he
other.
Be that as it may, Dr. A. Fauci’s security detail for the White House has, in the meantime, been revoked on 24 January 2025; this action included pulling the security provided by the National Institutes of Health, thus bringing to a close this unsavoury Big Pharma driven saga of suspense and Nazi-like coercion of citizens worldwide into a devastating hard lockdown of “pandemic proportions" (pardon the pun).
2 BREACH OF THE ‘NUREMBERG CODE OF ETHICAL RESEARCH’. Many
citizens today, myself included, are of the opinion that Dr. A. Fauci and Big
Pharma were in breach of the post WW2 Nuremberg Code for Ethical Research, and,
although not conclusively proved yet, investigations by Senator Rand Paul (USA)
etc. are still ongoing against the backdrop of the noise by critics who argue
that the rapid development and deployment of mRNA vaccines might not have
allowed for adequate, informed consent, or the full understanding of long-term
effects, potentially violating the principle of voluntary consent with full
understanding.
While no formal legal proceedings or widespread legal recognition have explicitly labelled the mRNA vaccine rollout as a breach of the Nuremberg Code, the debate, however, continues in public discourse, with some groups and individuals raising ethical concerns.
3 ISOLATION DECISION: VACCINATED/NOT VACCINATED. It so transpired
that my wife and I, who at the time had chosen not to be vaccinated, but had
opted for the ‘natural immunity’ route instead, were, along with others from
the (notorious) ‘Anti-Vaccination Resistance’,
consequently collectively widely castigated for our stance by copious mainline media
rhetoric in support of mandatory vaccinations and the subsequent harassment
following from all and sundry quarters, blaming people like us for perpetuating
and expediting the spread of the disease.
This prompted us to eventually
go into isolation since the last thing we wanted to be seen or charged with was that we we could be the cause of members of family or friends being infected by our
monumental indiscretion of refusing to be vaccinated with a hastily concocted
cocktail of a series of mRNA jabs masquerading as a bona fide vaccine.
Since we had opted for the ‘natural immunity’ route, it was thus not surprising that we eventually contracted Covid during November 2023, which we, together, overcame in about eight to ten days; my wife with the aid of her Bankmed approved general practitioner, and I with my personal set of tried and tested home remedies. According to Dr. Peter McCollough and Co., the natural immunity acquired from a Covid19 episode is potentially fourteen times more effective than any vaccine thus far produced, provided of course that one survives the ordeal.
4. FORMAL APOLOGIES. My
wife and I thus wish to hereby humbly, and profusely so, apologise to all
members of family or any friends that have (or may have) been affronted or
offended by our choice at the time to go into isolation for a “season” to avoid
the charge of “perpetuating the disease” and/or “indiscriminately infecting
others” by our hardline refusal to be vaccinated at the time.
The recent presidential pardon for Dr. A. Fauci, however, serves as a clear vindication of our formally unpopular choice and stance toward this saga, namely that this famed epidemiologist and his cohorts have probably been guilty of considerable overreach when they forced, egged on by considerable media hype and social hysteria, just about the entire world into a total lockdown that eventually wrecked lives, bankrupted businesses and impaired the education of children worldwide by keeping them away from school and the beneficial social interaction with their peers. The way forward probably is best described by the poet:
“A
friend is one who knows the best and the worst of us and loves us just the
same.”
(Henry Longfellow, 1807-1882).
Kind regards& God bless
CENTURION
RSA.